Former Republican Governors & Representatives File Motion Supporting Disney’s Lawsuit Against DeSantis

Several former Republican officials have filed a motion to support Disney in their lawsuit against Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District.

Republicans Support Disney’s Lawsuit

Entrance fountain spaceship earth featured image hero EPCOT 06242021 5485080 scaled 1

The filing is an amicus curiae brief, a type of filing from parties who are not involved in the case but provide information and expertise. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press also filed such a brief earlier this week.

Among the Republican officials who filed this latest brief are former Minnesota Governor Arne Carlson, former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman, former Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts Kerry Murphy Healy, and former U.S. Representatives Tom Coleman, Claudine Schneider, and Christopher Shays.

The brief states that Governor DeSantis’ actions are no doubt “retributive” against Disney.

After Disney publicly denounced Florida’s Parental Rights in Education bill, DeSantis and the legislature took several retaliatory actions, leading to taking over the Reedy Creek Improvement District, renaming it the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, and replacing the Board with DeSantis appointees.

The officials agree that DeSantis “has thrown down nothing short of a direct challenge to the founding principles of this country.” They make the same argument as Disney — that the Governor has violated their freedom of speech as outlined in the First Amendment. They compare DeSantis’ actions to those of the Russian and Chinese governments also punishing businesses, saying “retaliation and censorship are symptoms of autocracy.”

“In following these autocratic examples,” the brief states, “Governor DeSantis’s actions cause harm that is far broader than that suffered by Plaintiff [Disney Parks]. In choosing to punish Plaintiff in the public square for criticizing contentious legislation, Governor DeSantis has made clear that he will use the power of his office to exact retribution against any corporation that dares to ‘[u]se their economic power to advance’ an agenda contrary to his own, or to ‘become political and not merely economic actors.’ The Court should not validate this chilling authoritarian impulse if the promise of the Constitution is to have any meaning in the State of Florida.”

“Governor DeSantis, by seeking to legislate economic harm on Plaintiff in retaliation for its political opposition, has signaled to the marketplace that it cannot expect the certainty and predictability it requires to safely and profitably do business in the State of Florida. Any business considering expansion or further investment in the state must now take into account not just the business risks any going concern faces, but also the risk of economic retaliation from the Governor if it publicly opposes his political positions.”

Magic Kingdom cinderella castle featured stock 8336 HDR

The Walt Disney Company is suing for “declaratory and injunctive relief.” They stated in the initial lawsuit:

Disney regrets that it has come to this, but having exhausted efforts to seek a resolution, the Company is left with no choice but to file this lawsuit to protect its cast members, guests, and local development partners from a relentless campaign to weaponize government power against Disney in retaliation for expressing a political viewpoint unpopular with certain State officials.

Governor DeSantis filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. This motion is expected to be resolved soon.

CFTOD Suing Disney

Central Florida Tourism Oversight District logo

Meanwhile, the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District Board is countersuing Disney in state court. Disney failed to have the CFTOD Board’s lawsuit dismissed for being moot. Judge Margaret H. Schreiber stated a suit is only moot “when the controversy has been so fully resolved that a judicial determination can have no actual effect.”

In their suit, the Board asks the state court to render Disney’s development agreement with the Reedy Creek Improvement District as unenforceable, null, and void. They also ask the same to be done of the restrictive covenants.

It was the Board’s attempt to declare the development agreement null and void that led to Disney’s lawsuit.

The Board had a closed session meeting with their attorneys to discuss ongoing litigation at the end of the public July 26 Board meeting.

For the latest Disney Parks news and info, follow WDW News Today on TwitterFacebook, and Instagram.

The post Former Republican Governors & Representatives File Motion Supporting Disney’s Lawsuit Against DeSantis appeared first on WDW News Today.